We won't tell you that kids who become victims of online predators are usually engaging in risky online behaviors like going to sexual sites and chat rooms. It's weird to admit that adolescents are interested in that kind of stuff.
We won't ask to see what sites you're visiting or look at your chat logs from public chat rooms. We might see something that makes us uncomfortable.
We won't provide an open door to talk if you're a teenage boy questioning your sexuality, even though a quarter of online predators are looking for boys and it's often hard for gay teens to know what to do. It might be too controversial.
Sorry, kids! We just won't do the things we ought to do to help keep you safe.
Here's what we will do:
We will tell you that it's super super important to keep your name and pictures offline, even though research shows that has no effect on the likelihood of you being solicited. It's easy to teach simple solutions even if they don't work.
We will filter your internet use in school so that we don't have to deal with your risky online behaviors. We're not liable for what you do at home, and we'd rather not know.
We will take drastic steps to protect under-13s, even though they represent a ridiculously tiny fraction of online sex abuse cases and young kids are much more at risk from predatory relatives and people they know offline than strangers online. It makes us feel like we are accomplishing something.
We will pretend that online predators are usually people who pretend to be young then stalk and kidnap you, even though the vast majority of online predators tell you they're adults looking for sex and very few online sex abuse cases involve forced abduction. We prefer to ignore the uncomfortable truth.
Monday, December 3, 2007
What we won't do
Posted by
Jeremy Aldrich
at
6:18 PM
Labels: Internet safety
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




3 comments:
Maybe we SHOULD also monitor online activity a bit closer instead of resorting to the "helicopter" parent approach, which seems to just hover arounda nd ver really prevent or stop a potentially bad situation from happening. There are tools out there like PC Pandora that can help parents keep their kids safer. It's not spying, it being a damn good parent. (That's what I do anyway and my kid is alive, uses the Internet, and hasn't gotten into trouble yet).
I've mentioned this before in another discussion--the creepy "Teen Girl Runs Off to Mexico w/ Guy She Met Online" events are the ones that hit the news. If parents, teachers, IT people would think about what you said and realize the kiddo has a better chance of getting struck by lightening--twice, maybe they wouldn't be so nervous. Have you ever seen the statistics for stranger abductions? Compared to the number of kids in the US stranger abductions are a teeny part. Granted one is too many, but people have to think!
Hey, I linked to you over at So You Want To Teach? in the 148th Carnival of Education but it didn't trackback correctly. Sorry about that.
Post a Comment